During
the election period 2014, all of the internal parties are hectic to manage and
arrange the appropriate strategy to win the election. Because internal
committee party will be the one who in charged of all responsibility of
election result, and one of them is the leader. That’s why, a leader of party
certainly have a solid team and right-hand person to help him or her to running
the internal committee party.
A
power can regulate the system politic in their party. The power can derived
from they contribution in politic for long-term period, so they have capability
as the leader because of his or her experience, and also he or she can build
the power through his or her track record in politic organization. Or they come
from politic family, which become the background for his or her to running as a
leader. This kind of leader has a transmission power from the family. All
parties leader who has power and authority of party absolutely will not let the
party go with someone who has no contribution. They will set their right-hand
or their representative to be the internal of the parties, in order to help his
or her to control the party.
This
kind of power transmission will raise dynasty politic in party. For me, the
most interesting transmission power in party is when a parent gives credibility
to their children. This is a public secret when there is a leader put their
children in the structure of organization or party. I though this is a funny
phenomena where the leader being afraid of losing his or her power in party. If
they are really good, they suppose to be confidence and will not have negative
thinking if they will loss the power, right? There are some examples of dynasty
politic; PDIP leaded by Megawati and
now she looks like transfer her power to her daughter Puan Maharani, who
officiated as Chief of DPP-PDIP in Politic. NasDem
that leaded by Surya paloh also put his son in the commite as the Head of Gadra
Pemuda NasDem. Also Demokrat in their
crisis stage, SBY set his son Edhie Baskoro Yudhoyono to be the jendral
secretary (sekjen) of Demokrat.
These
three parties becomes the sample of power transmission in internal party. I
believe, there is a secret motivation to put their child in the party
committee. But basically, transmission of internal power actually aims to keep
maintaining the structure of party and also control the role of leader who owns
the power in a party. But there is misuse of power transmission, which
gravitates to create personal importance in party. I though, the effect of
having internal power in dynasty politic will interfere the value of politic. Also
there will be have a politic deal between internal committee. Afterward, this
phenomenon will affect to socio-politic in Indonesia If I see in macro side.
Thus I really disagree of this kind of political form in party.
Even
though the family relation is strong enough to do power transmission, I think
it will not work as they thought. Nowadays, people in internal party are
smarter and they will have back up strategy to oppose the discretion if they
feel the power transmission between families will affect the party’s work
ethic.
I
feel regret of this kind of private importance in a party, which transform
power. It can affects to the democracy system generally later. We will not see
the effect now, but later on when the dynasty politic become the kingdom which
control the politic system in Indonesia. And the worst thing is there is not
law, which establish the dynasty politic in party. My assumption, if the
dynasties politic will continue to the next level that can generate the
feudalism in party. Feudalism that I mention means negative effect of having
more power to control. The leader will think if they have absolute authority.
So, they will feel full ownership of the party.
Hopefully,
this kind of power transmission in internal party will not continue in the next
election. Because if this happen over and over for long term, my assumption is
this democracy country will be change to the monarchy system.
the first 2 paragraphs are confusing. ideas does not flow seamlessly but a huge jumble mess. i have to re-read everything again to be to understand the point you are trying to get across.
ReplyDeletepower transmission?? you meant transition..hehehhe...
setting up a dynasty is pretty common across all walk of life, not just in politic. the most common example would be a company. one will try to consolidate as much power within a company by hiring people who are within close relationship such as family members.